The resualting masters have always passed 'QC at mutiple tier 1 facilitiesĢ4bit audio does work with Voukoder 13 and connector 0.12.4. Need to add audio anyway as Voukoder is only good for picture, it will fail at 24bit audio, and fail at more then a single stereo track wash through an old (2016) MBP, it will re-wrap / render same as source so the file is identical, aside from haveing the ident "Appple Prores" in the headerĭisk speed is the only limitation, on a TB external i see the MBP moveing a Voukoder 4Scope/444 Prores at around 200fps What problems were you having with Kyno? Why couldn't you transcode to ProRes in it?ĭermot Shane wrote:i use Voukoder, and. You've found one! It does cost AU$229 though so not sure it's worth it yet. ![]() So after all this, people saying no such program exists. And to top it all off, Kyno is listed on Apple's official ProRes support page. I had no idea such a program even existed for Windows users. And all flavours of ProRes too! This is actually amazing. I was curious as to what Kyno is actually so I downloaded it to my Windows 11 PC and found that it does indeed transcode to ProRes. Don't know if encoding to Apple Prop Res using a program that is not officially supported by Apple can bring problems down the road. I was using Kyno which was officially supported by Apple to transcode to ProRes but now it is no longer supported and does not work anymore in my computer so I use Shutter encoder too. Mastix wrote:A cold bottle of champagne is waiting in the fridge the day that Resolve lets us Windows users export in Prores. Just wondering what other Windows users do when they have to deliver in ProRes? I can imagine this would be a waste of processing power and would result in a loss of quality. And I don't want to export DNxHR 444 10-bit because it's not a good idea to re-encode from 422 to 444, then back to 422. What should I export out of Resolve to put into Shutter Encoder without having to compromise quality? I've tried DNxHR HQX 10-bit but the bitrate is lower than ProRes 422HQ, so this method would result in losing quality. However, I do have limited space and time and this method results in the Uncompressed file being about 30GB per minute for 4K, not to mention exporting time is way too long. If I had unlimited space and time, I would export a QuickTime Uncompressed YUV 422 10-bit then put that file into Shutter Encoder to export out a final ProRes 422HQ. I want to retain as much quality as possible without having to re-encode a number of times. However, this is where I face the problem. I have to deliver it in ProRes 422HQ as well, so I'm trying to figure out the best exporting method.Īs Resolve on Windows doesn't come with ProRes export codecs I'm using Shutter Encoder. Where can I voice my opinion to Apple that I’d be grateful if they created a new player that included those functions.I'm using a Windows PC and I've edited my video in 4K ProRes 422HQ as that is what it was shot in. Have others pined over the loss of QT7 Pro? It was one of the reasons I stayed with Mojave for so long. Again: It was so fast and easy to do this in QTPro 7, incl opening the clips and saving the new ones. Going into Premiere Pro may be an option, but the license isn’t free and it’s more work than I’d like to do. ![]() ![]() ![]() While I’m trying to master that (I’ll report back if I crack the code), does anyone have any suggestions? Is there a player I’m missing? My brief exposure to FCPX leads me to believe that this isn’t such an easy thing to do, but maybe I’m wrong? (Does FCPX make “subclips”?) iMovie? I have very little knowledge of this program. I bet I can approximate it in Shutter Encoder, but it’s cumbersome. (I might pull a dozen or so fragments from a larger clip, as part of my reviewing process.) But I’ve yet to find another player with this function. It was like FCP7 Lite: If I’m watching a long clip and want to subclip it, I just hit Mark In and then a Mark Out, Copy and Paste it into a fresh QT clip and Save As. For example, I use IINA for playlists of clips, and I use Shutter Encoder for converting to other codecs.īut one function of QT7 Pro has been tricky to replace: The ease to isolate smaller portions and paste as a fresh clip. I’m sorry to lose QuickTime 7 Pro, although I’ve found a couple of programs that can replicate most of the functions I used to use regularly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |